<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Not Afraid! &#187; Editing resources</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notafraid.com/category/blog/film-making/editing-resources/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notafraid.com</link>
	<description>Inspired Digital Production</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:16:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Working with Multiple Aspect Ratios in FCP</title>
		<link>http://www.notafraid.com/2006/06/working-with-multiple-aspect-ratios-in-fcp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.notafraid.com/2006/06/working-with-multiple-aspect-ratios-in-fcp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editing resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indie Resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.notafraid.com/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So now you&#8217;ve shot widescreen, but you have to mix it with 4:3 video. What do you do? Well if you use Final Cut Pro there&#8217;s a nice video tutorial I found while on HD For Indies blog. While this if for Final Cut Pro, the principle applies to all NLE&#8217;s though they may use different  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now you&#8217;ve shot widescreen, but you have to mix it with 4:3 video. What do you do? Well if you use Final Cut Pro there&#8217;s a nice <a href="http://www.proapptips.com/proapptipsvideotutorials/879F6B61-CFF9-4FD1-8D43-FDF89605611A/6ECEC931-47F1-4BC1-8CD4-41FE4842B45D.html">video tutorial</a> I found while on <a href="http://www.hdforindies.com/2006/06/working-with-multiple-aspect-ratios-in.html">HD For Indies</a> blog. While this if for Final Cut Pro, the principle applies to all NLE&#8217;s though they may use different terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.notafraid.com/2006/06/working-with-multiple-aspect-ratios-in-fcp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why 16:9?</title>
		<link>http://www.notafraid.com/2006/06/why-169/</link>
		<comments>http://www.notafraid.com/2006/06/why-169/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editing resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indie Resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.notafraid.com/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that you know that widescreen is better, I know you&#8217;re out trolling for the best price on that shiny new HDTV you&#8217;ve had your eye on. But you&#8217;re wondering why does it have a 16:9 (or 1.78) aspect ratio? 
I mean if film Aspect ratios are 1.85 and 2.35, why aren&#8217;t HDTV&#8217;s 1.85? 
The answer to this  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;">Now that you know that </span><a href="http://www.notafraid.com/2006/06/wider-is-better.html"><span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;">widescreen is better</span></a><span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;">, I know you&#8217;re out trolling for the best price on that shiny new HDTV you&#8217;ve had your eye on. But you&#8217;re wondering why does it have a 16:9 (or 1.78) aspect ratio? <img style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4382/3101/320/1781logo.0.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;">I mean if film Aspect ratios are 1.85 and 2.35, why aren&#8217;t HDTV&#8217;s 1.85? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;">The answer to this question lies at </span><a href="http://www.videogrunt.com/"><span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;">VideoGrunt</span></a><span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;"> a video podcast all about digital video. So far there are only 3 podcasts laying down the basics of digital video and you guessed it&#8230; aspect ratios. The Video Grunt podcast is entertaining, concise, and interesting. They&#8217;ll give you a little history on aspect ratios, and even why HDTV is 16:9. So if your a videophile, a filmmaker, or even a </span><a href="http://www.notafraid.com/2006/06/me-tell-story-what-you-do/"><span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;">storyteller</span></a><span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;"> check it out and subscribe to the podcast. You won&#8217;t regret it.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.notafraid.com/2006/06/why-169/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wider is Better</title>
		<link>http://www.notafraid.com/2006/06/wider-is-better/</link>
		<comments>http://www.notafraid.com/2006/06/wider-is-better/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editing resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indie Resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.notafraid.com/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love widescreen films. When I was a teen-ager I was a projectionist for a small 2nd run movie theater. While learning to thread the projector and make splices I also got my first gleaning of aspect ratio, when I was taught the difference between a “scope” film and a “flat” film.
A “scope” film is  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;">I love widescreen films. When I was a teen-ager I was a projectionist for a small 2nd run movie theater. While learning to thread the projector and make splices I also got my first gleaning of aspect ratio, when I was taught the difference between a “scope” film and a “flat” film.<br />
A “scope” film is based in on cinemascope and features a very wide 2.35 aspect ratio:</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;"><img class="aligncenter" style="display: block; text-align: center;" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4382/3101/320/2351logo.1.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
While “flat” films are based on the normal Academy Aspect ratio of 1.85:</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;"> <img class="aligncenter" style="display: block; text-align: center;" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4382/3101/320/1851logo.1.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;">I remember seeing those “scope” movies and getting that more epic feel from them. I was always disappointed when watching these films on TV or VHS because TV’s are a 4:3 (or 1.33) aspect ratio: </span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;"><img class="aligncenter" style="display: block; text-align: center;" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4382/3101/320/1331logo.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;">It&#8217;s nearly square, not the epic rectangular ratio of widescreen film. So in order to fit this widescreen image on your TV, they cut the edges off! <a href="http://www.thedigitalbits.com/articles/anamorphic/aspectratios/widescreenorama.html">We were missing half the movie!</a></span></p>
<p>So I was very happy when DVD’s arrived and preserved the aspect ratio through letterboxing. As a digital filmmaker I always wanted to get the widescreen epic feeling, but until DVD burning became affordable I was always forced to fake widescreen by cropping a 4:3 image. Sure cameras like my trusty old Canon XL1 had an electronic squeeze mode, but in order to view it properly on a 4:3 screen I still had to create a letterboxed master for distribution. I was again saved by the advent of DVD’s. Since the DVD format allows for <a href="http://www.dvdfile.com/news/special_report/production_a_z/anamorphic.htm">anamorphic widescreen films </a>as described above, I’m able to work natively in 16:9 wide format and finish the project that way. All consumer DVD players are smart enough to recognize this material and automagically letterbox it to fit on your 4:3 screen or display it full screen on a widescreen television. It’ll also introduce <a href="http://www.dvdfile.com/news/special_report/production_a_z/3_2_pulldown.htm">pulldown</a> <span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;">for 24 fps film or video as well, but that’s a discussion for another day.</span></p>
<p>So go ahead and <a href="http://www.adamwilt.com/DV-FAQ-etc.html#widescreen">shoot widescreen</a>.  We have the technology.  Let&#8217;s use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.notafraid.com/2006/06/wider-is-better/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

